Discussion
In this prospective cohort study, we determined whether circulating markers of vitamin B6 were associated with the occurrence and severity of chronic CIPN in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CRC. A higher vitamin B6 status, measured as PLP or XA:HK ratio, during chemotherapy was associated with a reduced occurrence of chronic CIPN and with a lower severity of chronic CIPN symptoms. Vitamin B6 markers measured before or after chemotherapy were not associated with chronic CIPN.
In this study, chronic CIPN was found in 80% of the patients with CRC after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, which is in line with earlier studies.7 8 10 While we observed an inverse association between vitamin B6 levels during chemotherapy and chronic CIPN occurrence and severity, previous research has provided contradicting results.19 20 42 43 In observational analyses of data from a clinical trial among 2450 patients with colon cancer randomly assigned to 6 or 12 cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX with or without 3 years of celecoxib, higher dietary vitamin B6 intake was not associated with CIPN severity during or in the first approximately 6 years after oxaliplatin treatment (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.21 and OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.31, respectively).42 It should be noted, however, that dietary B6 intake is difficult to capture using common dietary assessment instruments, and dietary vitamin B6 intake is only moderately associated with circulating PLP levels.44 45 Moreover, in a cross-sectional study among patients who already had neuropathy (including diabetic, HIV and chemotherapy-induced) for an average of 6 years, the association between higher plasma B6 levels (>202 nmol/L PLP or >177 nmol/L pyridoxine) and chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy symptoms was assessed.43 Higher B6 status compared with normal B6 status (20–202 nmol/L PLP) was not associated with patient-reported neuropathy symptoms (paresthesia OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01 and numbness OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.995 to 1.002). While the neuropathy symptoms of these patients may not all originate from chemotherapy, the results are comparable to our study where we also did not observe associations for vitamin B6 status measured after chemotherapy. In a randomised placebo-controlled trial, the effect of a B-vitamin complex including vitamin B6 as pyridoxine (60 mg/day) on the incidence of CIPN symptoms 12 weeks post-chemotherapy was assessed among 71 patients diagnosed with various types of cancer receiving either oxaliplatin, taxanes or vincristine chemotherapy.19 The intervention did not result in a significant reduction of CIPN scores (p>0.05), but patients consuming the B-vitamin complex did perceive reduced sensory symptoms compared with the placebo group (p<0.05). It should be noted, however, that the precise role of vitamin B6 alone cannot be determined due to the multicomponent nature of the supplement used in this study.
In 2023, the European Food Safety Authority established an upper daily limit for vitamin B6 intake of 12.5 mg/day,46 due to concerns that excessive, often supplemental, intake of vitamin B6 could result in neurological complaints.21 Especially, the vitamin B6 form pyridoxine, often present in supplements, has been associated with decreased cell viability in a neuroblastoma cell line.22 Individual cases have been reported in which vitamin B6 blood levels (mostly measured as PLP) of 88 nmol/L have been linked to neuropathic complaints, although the majority of cases reported complaints with blood levels >183 nmol/L.23 In our study, as explicitly demonstrated in the RCS analysis, we did not find any evidence that occurrence or severity of chronic CIPN increased with higher levels of the vitamin B6 markers. However, it is worth to mention that there were only very few patients with elevated vitamin B6 levels in our study population (PLP levels >180 nmol/L: n=6 before chemotherapy, n=5 during chemotherapy and n=6 after chemotherapy). Although we cannot exclude potential detrimental effects of vitamin B6 at higher levels, our findings may imply that sufficient vitamin B6 levels during the administration of chemotherapy might be important in regard to chronic CIPN occurrence and severity.
The precise biological mechanisms underlying CIPN development are not entirely understood.47 The development of CIPN is multifactorial, but the main suggested aetiological mechanisms include mitochondrial toxicities, oxidative stress, DNA damage, axonal transport disruption and ion channel remodelling.48 Vitamin B6 is a cofactor for numerous biochemical reactions involved in a diverse range of cellular processes49 including nerve regeneration and synthesis of several neurotransmitters, for example, serotonin, dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid.15 Deficiencies in these neurotransmitters may result in neuronal overactivity and subsequent neurodegeneration.21 Overall, vitamin B6 is important in restoring nerve function via several physiological processes,15 which could explain the observed associations with a lower occurrence and decreased severity of chronic CIPN. We did, however, not observe an association between PL levels, the transport form of vitamin B626 and chronic CIPN outcomes, implying that particularly the biologically active PLP26 may be important for the prevention of nerve damage and regeneration during the actual chemotherapy treatment period.50
It should be noted that the PLP levels were slightly lower during chemotherapy compared with the other two timepoints, yet they were still within the normal range of an adequate vitamin B6 status.51 This finding may imply that vitamin B6 status might be affected by the chemotherapy itself, either directly through the biological mechanisms of oxaliplatin52 or indirectly through changes in diet or dietary supplement use during chemotherapy treatment.53 54 Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of reverse causation indicating that the associations observed between higher levels of vitamin B6 markers and chronic CIPN occurrence and severity might actually reflect efficacy of the treatment. The causal relationship between vitamin B6 status and chronic CIPN is thus an area for future research. In our analysis, we did not adjust for cumulative oxaliplatin dose, given the ambiguous relationship with chronic CIPN. A higher cumulative dose of oxaliplatin could be linked to a higher occurrence of chronic CIPN, due to the higher (cumulative) exposure. On the other hand, a lower cumulative dose of oxaliplatin could indicate more treatment modifications as a consequence of acute CIPN. Since acute CIPN is a profound risk factor for chronic CIPN,9 a lower cumulative oxaliplatin dose might also be related to a higher occurrence of chronic CIPN.
The current study comes with some potential limitations. First, although the EORTC questionnaire has been shown to be reliable and valid,29 patient-reported questionnaires are prone to overestimate CIPN occurrence.55 It is, however, not likely that vitamin B6 levels are coherent with a possible overestimation of chronic CIPN symptoms. Moreover, we consider the patient’s perspective of utmost importance. Second, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy, due to for example diabetes, is a well-established risk factor of CIPN,56 but no data on pre-existing neuropathy were available in this study. Nevertheless, self-reported diabetes mellitus occurred in 11% of our population and we adjusted our analyses for this. Third, the blood samples were not collected in fasted conditions, making the vitamin B6 markers susceptible to recent dietary intake.26 This issue is, however, unlikely to cause overestimation of the observed associations, as the variations tend to be non-differential for patients who did and did not develop chronic CIPN. Fourth, the timing of blood sampling was based on the time since diagnosis, not on chemotherapy schedules. For some patients, the second sample that was planned 6 months after diagnosis (ie, during chemotherapy) was collected shortly after completion of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (n=91, median [Q1–Q3]: 40 [20–85] days after last cycle), while others were yet to receive their final cycle of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (n=122, median [Q1–Q3]: 24 [45–15] days before last cycle). Future studies are warranted to investigate the role of chemotherapy regimens on circulating vitamin B6 levels by measuring circulating vitamin B6 levels at fixed timepoints during chemotherapy cycles. Lastly, due to the observational design of this study, we cannot fully exclude reverse causation and residual confounding. The strengths of this study include thorough assessment of vitamin B6 status using direct and functional biomarkers over time in a well-defined study population. PLP levels and XA:HK ratios, considered independent markers of vitamin B6 status, showed similar results, which diminishes the risk of incidental findings. Furthermore, we could adjust for a comprehensive set of potential confounders due to the availability of extensive data on clinical and lifestyle factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the association between plasma markers of vitamin B6 status before, during and after chemotherapy and chronic CIPN.
In conclusion, a higher vitamin B6 status measured during chemotherapy was associated with a lower occurrence of chronic CIPN and lower chronic CIPN severity in our population of patients with non-metastatic CRC undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Although, causality and safe upper limits for vitamin B6 status need to be confirmed, these findings highlight the importance of nutritional status in oncology care and might ultimately provide preventive strategies to protect against this distressing side-effect. Future research is warranted to investigate the optimal vitamin B6 status during chemotherapy in order to provide a solid basis for nutritional recommendations during oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.